The Blackwood Dossier
A student leaves a coastal library at closing time and is never recorded again on any road out of the valley.
€500
for a verified resolution- Status
- Active
- Submissions
- Open
- Attribution
- First verified resolution
- Closing date
- 31 Dec 2026
Included in Membership
Access price is what you pay to open a case file. Case reward is what an investigator may receive for a verified resolution. They are never the same amount.Demo prices and membership terms shown for interface development only.CASE NOT YET RELEASED
This investigation has not yet been released by the Bureau.
Check back soon for new cases.How access works
- Demo prices, plans and inclusions are provisional and require approval.
- No payment logic exists yet — nothing on this page charges or unlocks anything.
- Payment never affects investigative evaluation, recognition or awards.
Workspace locked
The Investigation Workspace opens once this dossier is part of your access. Use the simulated purchase or membership above; access is stored locally until the real purchase and membership systems are connected.
Reward conditions
- PLACEHOLDER — Submit a complete resolution through the Review Board form before the closing date.
- PLACEHOLDER — The resolution must identify the responsible party, the motive and the supporting evidence.
- PLACEHOLDER — Submissions are evaluated against the published case rules by the Review Board.
- PLACEHOLDER — Purchasing or accessing a case does not guarantee a reward.
What the Bureau knows
A student leaves a coastal library at closing time and is never recorded again on any road out of the valley. The Bureau closed the file after a single review, then reopened it when a later clerk found that two of its documents could not both be true. The dossier is presented as it was archived: complete, contradictory and unresolved.
The file originates in Blackwood Forest and passed through three administrative reviews without a determination. Records were copied by hand at least once, and the transcription differs from the original in ways the archive never reconciled. Nothing in this dossier has been corrected for you.
On the evidence contained in this dossier, what is the most defensible account of what happened, and which document must be wrong for that account to hold?
- The file is registered under reference OB-DEMO-014.
- 34 evidence items are catalogued in the dossier.
- At least two documents disagree on the recorded sequence of events.
- One recovery entry has no responsible officer named.
- No determination of responsibility was ever entered.
- Which of the two conflicting chronologies is supported by physical material?
- Why was the file re-sealed after its second review?
- Who authorised the movement recorded without a signature?
- What was removed between the original folder and the copied one?
Read the dossier, establish a chronology you can defend, identify the contradiction the Bureau overlooked, and submit a reasoned resolution.
What the file contains
Everything below is included with access to this investigation. Materials are presented as archived — annotated, incomplete and occasionally contradictory.
Case Brief
The Bureau's opening summary, official question and investigative scope.
1 documentEvidence Photographs
Scene, object and archival photography prepared for close examination.
~14 imagesWitness Statements
Transcribed and handwritten accounts, including inconsistent testimony.
5 statementsPersons of Interest
Neutral profiles with known associations and unverified claims.
5 profilesMaps
District, route and shoreline fragments annotated by field officers.
3–5 fragmentsTimeline
Reconstructed chronology with gaps left deliberately unresolved.
1 working chronologyPolice-Style Reports
Fictional district reports, duty logs and follow-up memoranda.
4–8 reportsArchive Documents
Press cuttings, registers and administrative correspondence.
6–12 documentsInvestigator Notebook
A private working notebook for annotations, theories and links.
Resolution Submission Form
The official form used to submit your own reasoned resolution.
A partial view of the material
Selected items are shown in preview. Restricted material remains obscured so the investigation stays intact — nothing decisive is displayed here.
PreviewScene photographRecorded near Blackwood Forest. Photographer unidentified. - OB-DEMO-014 / R-1District Report — ExtractSubject file: The Blackwood DossierLocality: Blackwood ForestDuty officer: name withheld pending review.Initial assessment: circumstances not accounted for.Continuation pages restricted at this access level.Preview
District report extractOpening report, first page. Later pages withheld. 
Available After AccessEvidence materialItem recovered during the second review. - OB-DEMO-014 / W-4Witness Statement — FragmentI remember the hour because of the bell.There was someone at the far end of the road.I did not see the face clearly, only the coat.The rest of this statement is restricted.Restricted
Witness statementStatement fragment. Identifying details removed. 
RestrictedMap fragmentAnnotated district fragment with two erased marks. - OB-DEMO-014 / A-9Archive Movement SlipFile opened: 2026-06-18Movements recorded: 3Sealed by: officer reference illegibleReopened for civil review.Available After Access
Archive slipRe-sealing slip attached to the original folder.
Who and where the file names
All persons are fictional. No individual in this dossier is presented as responsible for anything.
Last Known ContactT. Venn
Recorded in contact with the subject shortly before the file opens.
WitnessE. Marchand
Provided an account that conflicts with the recorded chronology.
Person of InterestR. Halloway
Named in the file. No determination of responsibility has been made.
Bureau OfficialM. Deverre
Signed the reopening request on behalf of the archive.
Key locations
Blackwood Forest
Primary locality referenced throughout the dossier.
Bureau records annex
Where the file was held between reviews.
Field office, coastal district
Where the original statements were taken.
A working chronology
A short extract from the reconstructed timeline included in the dossier. Gaps are deliberate.
- 2024·03
Last confirmed sighting
A single corroborated account places the subject on a public road.
- 2024·03
Document submitted
A form is lodged with the district office, dated before it was signed.
- 2024·04
Witness interviewed
A second account contradicts the first on the hour, not the place.
- 2024·07
Evidence recovered
Material is logged into the archive without a recovery officer named.
- 2026·06
Archive reopened
The Bureau releases the file for civil investigation.
Who this case suits
Read before you commit. This file rewards patience with documents more than speed.
- Chronology
- Witness comparison
- Map analysis
- Contradiction detection
- Content note placeholder: references to disappearance and institutional failure.
- No graphic imagery. Document scans include handwriting of variable legibility.
- Transcripts are provided for handwritten material where legibility is low.
For this dossier specifically
Provisional demo values. The route marked below is simply the one that fits this file's current access model — there is no deadline and nothing expires.
- Individual Purchase
€9.99
one-off- Permanent access to the purchased case
- Full dossier and private workspace
- Progress preserved between sessions
- Resolution submission included
- Investigator MembershipBest fit for this case
€14.99
per month (provisional)- Access to selected archive dossiers
- 10% off individual purchases
- Monthly bureau briefings
- Community access
- Senior Investigator Membership
€24.99
per month (provisional)- All Investigator benefits
- 20% off individual purchases
- Early access to new files
- Exclusive senior dossiers
Fiction and fairness
- This investigation, its persons, documents and institutions are entirely fictional.
- No real victims, suspects, investigations or organizations are represented.
- Access grants an entertainment investigation experience, not real case material.
- Payment never influences Review Board evaluation, recognition or awards.
- Rewards apply only to eligible cases and are stated on each case file.
- Reward conditions are defined per case and published with that case.
- Submissions are evaluated according to the published rules.
- Purchasing a case does not guarantee a reward.
Other files in the archive
The file is waiting
An immersive dossier, a private workspace that keeps your notes and progress, and the right to submit an official resolution when you are ready to stand behind it.